The new breed of self-diagnosed researchers
One day, I realised I had Asperger’s Syndrome.
How did I reach this conclusion? I read an article on the Wikipedia, and saw how the traits that are common in the condition were a good fit for me. I made a leap of faith, and I’ve not looked back since.
Once I’d done this, I started to gather other sources of information from the web. First came factual articles from professional bodies that had an interest in Asperger’s, and then came the rather more personal blog accounts from people who wanted to share their thoughts on a condition they lived with. AS became a Special Interest of mine.
Writing is my favourite means of communication, the one that I’m most comfortable with and through which I find it easiest to express myself. Writing is my thing. I guess it was natural then, that I too ultimately chose to blog my thoughts and findings about Asperger’s. I started out doing thisĀ because I thought that others might be interested in what I had to say.
And it was at this point that something unexpected started to happen. I started to make connections.
In the first instances, writing about how I saw my condition allowed me to have revelations about how the condition actually worked. By exploring traits and how they applied to me, I was able to see new and unexpected aspects about how they and I worked. I wrote these down, and published them for all to see. From the comments I’ve received, some of these have clearly caused similar thoughts and feelings in others, which is great to see – it makes me realise I’m not alone in feeling like this.
Eventually, I started to make connections through what others were blogging about AS too. My blogging peers all say things in slightly different ways, and often that now acts as a trigger for seeing some aspect of how the condition affects me in a new and exciting way. I blog about these connections too.
What I’ve realised in the few short months since I started writing here is that I seem to have something of a talent for seeing my own condition in a huge amount of detail. If I think, and get my thoughts on paper, then I can often see some really quite striking things about how Asperger’s really works. It’s far from being just me that seems to have this ability – those who write the other AS blogs that I read almost all seem to have it too, which I find fascinating.
I’m starting to think that the ability to see how our own condition works in the minutest of detail is quite an overlooked Aspie skill.
One article in particular has stood out to me this week, that I think illustrates this phenomenon very well. Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg did a review of the Theory of Mind test, and reached what I thought was a quite surprising, but astonishingly insightful conclusion. You won’t find Rachel’s theory in a book to the best of my knowledge, but it really rings true with me. Go and read it if you haven’t already – you won’t be disappointed.
As Rachel says in the above article:
I would much rather hear an autistic person describe his or her own experience than hear a neuro-typical researcher making statements about how autistic people view the world.
How wonderfully well said. I have a great deal of respect for those researchers who are dedicating their working lives to help understand our complex condition. Ultimately however, unless they have an ASD, they can’t fully understand how it works, and this must colour their judgement to a degree.
I genuinely think that the professional Asperger’s researchers would do well in subscribing to all the AS blogs they can find – because they will find a wealth of information that they won’t find elsewhere – information that they won’t get simply from the therapists chair. This is information that has often been formed via a melding of thought and writing – two things that foks with AS often have a skill with.
We can see things that they can’t, and what’s more, we are already writing about these insights.
The professional researchers really should be listening, yet sadly, I suspect they’re not.
If I’m wrong, perhaps you could let me know, by writing me a comment.
Related posts:
- Dealing with it I was keen to start this blog because I’ve felt...
- Bulldozing new neural connections The ever thought-provoking John Elder Robison has an interesting new...
- Satisfaction Whenever I publish an article here, I get an immense...
4 Responses to “The new breed of self-diagnosed researchers”
Leave a Reply


Catana on April 8th, 2009 Catana(Quote)
I also started with the authorities, the research, but I learned most about myself from reading other bloggers, and the articles by those on the spectrum. What’s important for me is having aspects of who I am brought into awareness through the experiences of those who are like me in important ways. In some ways, I don’t even care if it’s called Asperger’s, or nothing at all. Yes, there are connections there in the way many of us think, the insights we have about ourselves, and how we are different from the norm. I’m just not ready yet to say for certain whether that particular type of cognition and insight is specific to Asperger’s.
James on April 14th, 2009 James(Quote)
Catana,
Thanks for your thoughts.
I’m with you on not knowing whether various insights are specifically Asperger’s or not.
Ask me one day and I’ll give you a definite yes. Ask me the next day and I won’t be so sure. The same seems to apply to lots of things for me. Ask me one day and I’ll tell you I’ve never been more sure that Asperger’s has thoroughly shaped my life, and then the next I’ll be questioning whether I have it at all.
My unsureness about everything is making me keen to look at getting a formal diagnosis. I feel that if I went down that road I could be sure about it. You know what though? I bet it’d end up changing nothing – I suspect I’d still have days where I felt unsure.
James
AS4L on April 18th, 2009 AS4L(Quote)
And how do you know you don’t have a condition that has common traits with Asperger’s Syndrome? Self-diagnosis is a fallacy as other possible causes of your symptoms have not been eliminated, which is part of the work a professional psychologist will undertake in order to diagnose.
James on April 18th, 2009 James(Quote)
Hi AS4L,
Whilst I respect your point of view on this, and can easily see how you reach your conclusion, I can’t agree with you.
I’ve yet to write on this blog about how I reached my own conclusions – one day I will.
Many of us who research the possibility of whether we have Asperger’s end up doing it in a very Aspie-typical way. We gather huge amounts of evidence from many sources, and then analyse and pattern match over quite a period of time before reaching a conclusion. This is what I did.
In my case this included studying the DSM IV texts that psychologists use to do their diagnosis, reading books by Tony Attwood and the autobiography of Liane Holliday Willey – who was diagnosed with Asperger’s in adulthood. I also started to read several AS blogs.
One thing was self evident – I had the same traits as described by both the bloggers and in the case studies in Tony Attwoods book. For once in my life people were talking about experiences that were like my own. Frequently passages in Lianne’s book left me surprised and empathic as her experiences echoed mine.
I could provide relevant examples to fit all of the diagnostic criteria for Asperger’s on the DSM IV.
I don’t think for one minute that my experience in self diagnosis was much different from many others.
I was left feeling that it explained everything – hence the title of this blog. And after 35 years of never quite fitting in, and much time spent looking for the answers of why this was, I felt I finally had them.
I may well in the end go and get a formal diagnosis. If I do, I’m confident I already know the outcome.
When you have spent a many years with undiagnosed Asperger’s, it is entirely possible to self-diagnose yourself, I can assure you.
I will write up my own experiences in time.
James